Alito wrote the opinion in 1999 in a case that said a Christmas display on city property did not violate separation of church and state doctrines because it included a large plastic Santa Claus as well as religious symbols.
That's like saying the KKK isn't racist because they allow black members.
What a moron.
That's like saying the KKK isn't racist because they allow black members.
What a moron.
..
Date: 2005-10-31 02:59 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 06:40 pm (UTC)From:Yeah, there's some validity to that argument.
And that little quote I posted doesn't give the whole story. Personally, I'm not very opposed to religious displays on municipal grounds. But it makes me nervous because who knows how far it could go. If we allow it in one instance, another city could take the opportunity to do more blatant promotion.
..
Date: 2005-10-31 06:57 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 03:25 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 06:36 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 03:46 pm (UTC)From:Saint Nicklaus, bishop, is decidedly
buddhistCatholic, I'd have to admit...no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 05:10 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 06:34 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 06:37 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 06:37 pm (UTC)From:Sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 04:18 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-31 07:14 pm (UTC)From:I just hate little figures showing Santa Claus at the Manger worshiping the baby. I keep them separate. If one chose, one could celebrate Christmas strictly from a non-religious angle and if one chose, one could do only Christian things.