It's the soldier, not the reporter
who has given us freedom of the
PRESS
It's the soldier, not the poet
who has given us freedom of
SPEECH
It's the soldier, not the campus organizer
Who has given us the freedom to
DEMONSTRATE
It's the soldier, not the lawyer
who has given us the right to a
FAIR TRIAL
It's the soldier who salutes the flag,
who serves under the flag
whose coffin is draped by the flag,
who gives the protester the right to burn the flag.
-Father Dennis O'Brien, US Marine Corp. Chaplain
It is important to remember those who have fought for these freedoms. Honor their memories and never give up these rights.
who has given us freedom of the
PRESS
It's the soldier, not the poet
who has given us freedom of
SPEECH
It's the soldier, not the campus organizer
Who has given us the freedom to
DEMONSTRATE
It's the soldier, not the lawyer
who has given us the right to a
FAIR TRIAL
It's the soldier who salutes the flag,
who serves under the flag
whose coffin is draped by the flag,
who gives the protester the right to burn the flag.
-Father Dennis O'Brien, US Marine Corp. Chaplain
It is important to remember those who have fought for these freedoms. Honor their memories and never give up these rights.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 03:16 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 03:18 pm (UTC)From:Soldiers are people who are very good at following orders. If the orders say that they should fight for the rights Father O'Brien reminds us of, they'll do that. If the orders are to blow up hospitals, target ambulances, or drive tanks over peaceful civilians right here on American soil, they'll do that, too. Soldiers are people who, after all, might face a firing squad should they refuse any order they are given.
I prefer to remember today as Armistice Day, a day when at least one war ended, rather than as Veteran's Day.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 03:46 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:53 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)JT CLARK
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:09 pm (UTC)From:Fucking idiot. I got yer "CHRISTIAN nation" right here. Because, you know, Jesus loved tanks. I don't know what the election proved, but you're pretty good evidence that people who think that America is a "Christian nation" are mental midgets.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:27 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:20 pm (UTC)From:some of us are christians, some are muslim,...
c'mon. you've heard all of this before.
"give me your tired, your poor..."
not "send only your christians, your bible readers."
Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law
~Thomas Jefferson
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:26 pm (UTC)From:I certainly did not mean to imply that we should ignore the wrongs of some because of the sacrifices of others. I usually avoid general staements like this, but this time I felt it was helpful to quote an e-mail forward to make my point.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:32 pm (UTC)From:How many holidays does America have to honor peace, and how many to honor war?
The poem, written by a military chaplain, ignores the point that the soldiers didn't decide on which side of rights they were going to fight. As many soldiers have died in the pursuit of oppression as have in the cause of freedom... perhaps more. The soldiers that died in Vietnam, for example. For what they were going to fight was decided by someone else.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:24 pm (UTC)From:about honoring peace.
for instance, martin luther king day
is not really a holiday, although some will take it
on principle. why is it less important than veterans day.
maybe it's not- maybe the tradition of veterans day
that remains steadfast.
still, i do see a need for military in every nation
and i don't believe utopia will ever come,
by warring or by peaceful means.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:36 pm (UTC)From:Peace will come when people realize that they are finished with killing each other, because they've been doing it for thousands of years and it has accomplished nothing but killing each other.
And why
do you
insist
on typing
like you're writing poetry
when you're endorsing bloodshed?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:39 pm (UTC)From:the way i'm writing has nothing to do with it.
the end.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:44 pm (UTC)From:WAKE UP. You're dreaming.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 07:37 pm (UTC)From:because i think we need a military in order to protect our country
you say i am endorsing bloodshed.
i happen to be against war in general, however,
i do believe that we need to protect our borders
and in keeping an army, we find ourselves using it in ways
that i do not agree with. everything that is invented
finds its way into hands that misuse it
so that even the good is distorted.
i am against the war in iraq.
i thought wrongly that you *knew* my views just a little bit
and would understand my meaning in the previous comment.
therefore, i didn't feel we were debating.
how is it that i'm dreaming!
i think that people who believe that everyone on the planet
will work together and play nice are dreaming.
even those who work peaceably will be met by tyrants,
this remains a fact. it's human nature that leads us to warring,
and, although i wish that it would, i feel that no amount of time will change this.
clearly, we do not learn from history, so what will compel this marveoluos change you dream of.
compared to many of my fellow americans,
i feel i am wide awake
and it's painful to watch as our rights
get trampled and squandered away.
unfortunately, i find myself living in a nation
whose concentration seems to be ruling the world,
a notion i strongly detest.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 07:49 pm (UTC)From:We live in a world that can provide for everyone. Every single person. Nobody needs to be hungry, sick, homeless, dispossessed. When we start living that way, we won't need the military. We don't have to live in a world full of enemies. As long as we do otherwise, then we're dreaming, because in the end the military can't protect you. Ultimately, on the course that we're going, it will kill us all.
The dream you're dreaming is that armies are necessary. They aren't. Armies exist to enforce the philosophies of governments when a contradictory philosophy threatens its goals. Armies serve the interests of tyrants more often than not, because no tyrant could maintain their power without an army behind him/her.
War must end, or humanity will. And it's time to wake up from this fantasy that we've been fed that human nature is basically destructive. The nature of those who have risen to power may be, but human beings have a natural tendency to get along and work out their differences until forced to do otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 08:15 pm (UTC)From:You're right, except that peace will only come when everyone realizes this *and* decides to do something about it. Anyone who thinks otherwise is one of those dreamers that The Right is always sneering at. However, I think we can make great strides toward peace if we reduce our military and its presence. What you're saying and what I'm saying is only one of many reasons that Bushco is wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 09:45 am (UTC)From:Which, of course, presupposes that someone does these things first. If not myself, then who?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 02:10 am (UTC)From:And even as I disagree with you on some of your points, I am glad I won't convince you to discontinue your hardline advocacy of peace.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 07:45 pm (UTC)From:Indymedia is a site so relentlessly biased and twisted that I assume whatever they have to say is a lie unless I can corroborate it elsewhere. Considering how they've reported things I've witnessed in person, I refuse to trust them. If they reported that the sky was blue, I'd go outside and check.
If you think this holiday is about honoring or glorifying war, though, you're missing the point by lightyears. But if you want to blame the whole for the actions of a tiny part of it, well, that's one of the rights your ancestors earned for you.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:30 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 04:56 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 04:09 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 02:03 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 08:09 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 01:01 am (UTC)From: