What hit the Pentagon?

[low_delta]

There is certain controversy about the airliner that was shupposed to have hit the Pentagon on September 11th. I saw a website about this, back in late '01 or early '02. Earlier this week, I was wondering what ever happened to that controversy, then the ghost of Zuul posted this film. Still going on. I think it was under the radar because it sounds (on the surface) like a classic "conspiracy theory."

But nothing there really sounds crackpot to me. I'd be interested in hearing if anyone can provide any information to debunk this account.

(two sites, same film)
http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
http://pentagonstrike.co.uk/pentagon.htm

When that other account was first posted by a friend, one of her friends posted a how dare you! hundreds of people were killed there, and my husband was there and he saw the plane! sort of reply. Still doesn't answer the question of how a giant Boeing 757 could hit a building and leave no hole. The previous account I mentioned asked why a jet with a wingspan of hundreds of feet could have left a collapsed wall behind that was no more than 70 feet wide. In this one, they show pictures of before the fire caused that wall to collapse.

For those of you without the bandwidth to view the film, it shows photos of the aftermath, with no sign of a jet airliner - no giant hole, crater in the lawn or aircraft debris of any kind (at the site or being removed). Also includes eyewitness accounts who describe a small airplane, and a secondary explosion, as well as one person who recognized the smell of explosives, and not jet fuel.

So what do you think?

Comments

[low-delta.livejournal.com]

Some of those debunkings talk about how strongly the building was reinforced. So if the building resisted the impact, wouldn't all of the plane be left outside?

Here's a question: Where are the fuel tanks? In the wings or in the fuselage?