Date: 2003-05-14 03:37 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] vwip.livejournal.com
hmm, or so they say. maybe the crappy reaction it got made them want to pull the plug on it, and saying it was a hoax was the most face-saving way.

Date: 2003-05-14 03:42 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] cynnerth.livejournal.com
I think that's a good possibility.

Date: 2003-05-14 03:51 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] vwip.livejournal.com
yeah, i think they just wanted to wash their hands of it.

Re:

Date: 2003-05-14 03:59 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] cynnerth.livejournal.com
Bathroom humor...I love it ;)

Date: 2003-05-14 06:48 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Yeah, but they had testimonials from test groups, didn't they? That sounded a little odd.

Date: 2003-05-14 07:56 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] specificocean.livejournal.com
It's a load of crap....*s*

Date: 2003-05-14 08:24 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] zonal.livejournal.com
I'm glad to see that the idea went down the tubes.

Date: 2003-05-14 08:32 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] spooble.livejournal.com
Except today there's a report that said they really had made the proposal (in addition to others) and tanked it when it was received so poorly.

Date: 2003-05-14 10:10 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Confusion seems to be their best form of disinformation.

Date: 2003-05-14 04:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] vlinker.livejournal.com
Darn!

LOL

Profile

low_delta: (Default)
low_delta

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 02:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios