low_delta: (Default)
First of all, let me say I've read those books more times than is healthy (but I have a poor memory).
Second, I am a picky geek.

I liked the movie. I was impressed. Go see it.

The special effects were impressive if not flawless (watch for when Bilbo doesn't cast a shadow when he walks in front of his fireplace).

The characters were a little thin, but that is to be expected. There were many of them, and I don' think they were all too deep, in the book. They did develop though, so I won't hold it against them. I think Boromir was actually a bit deeper in this film than he was in the book.

They added some scenes that were only alluded to in the book. I was annoyed at the battle and imprisonment of Gandalf until I remembered that Gandalf did mention that it took place, in the book. This was good.

They added a few scenes that didn't really happen. At least they were never mentioned in the book. I mean, maybe they really took place. Nothing happened that seemed out of place.

I was impressed by Galadriel. I fully expected not to be impressed by a movie version of someone more beautiful than humanly possible, but they did a good job. The actress' voice was much older - more mature - than her face. Good effect.

I didn't like the ears.

There were a couple of John Howe scenes. If you're familiar with Tolkien art (not Tolkien's, but work that has been produced for Tolkien product, especially calendars), you might recognize them. One was a very Howe-esque castle gate, and the other was the scene where the Hobbits were crouching behind a tree, hiding from a Nazgul. It seemed to be a recreation of one of Howe's paintings.

The soundtrack was good.

Legolas is supposed to have brown hair.

That guy from The Matrix played a very angry Elrond.

Ian Holm was a bit more frenetic than I imagined Bilbo, but that's what one expects from Ian.

I'll probably think of more. I'll try to spare you. ;-)

Anyway, I give it a thumb up (that's a good thing, really). See it, if you have any interest at all.

And Frodo looks like Winona Ryder.

Date: 2001-12-20 01:30 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] cherie.livejournal.com
Glad to get your first hand review. Thanks. I was just a little concerned about the length of 2 hours 58 minutes. Did it go by fast or seem uncomfortably long?

Date: 2001-12-20 03:52 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] cynnerth.livejournal.com
2 hours and 58 minutes? That must include all the previews. I didn't think it lasted that long. Time went by pretty quickly. I started to get uncomfortable sitting there (achy knees) but I didn't realize how long it had been. I have trouble sitting still for very long.

Date: 2001-12-20 03:28 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com
damn, you are one tough critic.

Date: 2001-12-20 11:51 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Between you and me, it's got two thumbs up. What more do you want? : )

Re:

Date: 2001-12-20 02:22 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com
i won't tell :)

Date: 2001-12-20 04:16 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] serendipity.livejournal.com
He'll accept NO DISSENT, none. Either you're 100% thrilled by the film experience, or you're a complete traitor.

(Oops, sorry, i, just kidding!)

Date: 2001-12-20 12:10 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] msfledermaus.livejournal.com
Frodo does, doesn't he?

I'm looking forward to this soooo much!!!!

Profile

low_delta: (Default)
low_delta

February 2026

S M T W T F S
12 3 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 02:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios