http://www.msnbc.com/news/627028_asp.htm?pne=asp
Is that it? What aren't they telling us? Is this just for show, in the hopes that Afghanistan will back down? I'd like to remain optimistic that that is the result that the administration is hoping for, but I know that if they do not give us bin Laden, we will attack. But what sort of attack?
"...the likely targets will be sites in Afghanistan."
"Afghan leaders ... warned of revenge..." No shit.
"A factor that could keep retaliation on hold is that the United States has lost track of bin Laden’s location in Afghanistan."
Is that it? What aren't they telling us? Is this just for show, in the hopes that Afghanistan will back down? I'd like to remain optimistic that that is the result that the administration is hoping for, but I know that if they do not give us bin Laden, we will attack. But what sort of attack?
"...the likely targets will be sites in Afghanistan."
"Afghan leaders ... warned of revenge..." No shit.
"A factor that could keep retaliation on hold is that the United States has lost track of bin Laden’s location in Afghanistan."
no subject
Date: 2001-09-14 07:46 am (UTC)From:It was a lame joke, and we both knew it. Looks like we're going to completely freak out on this one..
Please please please keep your heads together, guys....:(