low_delta: (photographer)
My Photoshop skills continue to improve. I put a lot of work into this one. You probably can't tell what I did, but that's the point.





It was probably obvious that the sky was retouched. It was a bit of work to come up with the right color. The rest of it has a slight saturation boost, but it was done with colors, and not the saturation slider. And a slight contrast increase. And a slight crop. Yes, everything is slight.

Yes, that's me. Cyn found the location, I posed. This was in Indiana, taken on sunday morning, at the overlook at Brookville Lake.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-07-01 07:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
First, I increased the contrast in the sky, but only the sky. Then, since that changed the color, I had to change the color.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-07-01 11:47 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Levels and curves? Hell yeah. Check where the light falls, with levels, then adjust it with curves. That's how I set the contrast on the sky. Then I used selective color to fix it.

Cyn made the icon. :-)

Date: 2009-07-01 08:51 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com
Looks delish!

Date: 2009-07-01 11:28 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] banana.livejournal.com
Nice job, particularly the sky!

Some parts look like you sharpened a bit too much: the bottom edge of the roof and your right shoulder are a bit jagged, and the trees look a little... sharpened!

Date: 2009-07-01 07:14 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Hmm. They're both jagged, though the top one is slightly more so. It might be due to the compression. I check it out some more when I get home.

Do you really think it's sharpened too much? I always fade the sharpening to 75% (or lower). I like it sharp, but not too sharp.

Date: 2009-07-02 06:09 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] banana.livejournal.com
It's the trees I really noticed - trees at that distance *should* be a bit fuzzy.

Date: 2009-07-02 11:26 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Foliage should always be less-sharp than other objects. But it's such small part of the scene, that I went with the rest.

Date: 2009-07-01 11:54 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
I just remembered that I sharpened the "original" version too. The reason is that after resizing it, it gets too blurry, and wouldn't be a fair comparison.

I see a white halo around the dark objects, and that seems to be from compression (I do "save for web").

As for the jagged edges, I suggest not sitting too close to your monitor. ;-)

Date: 2009-07-02 06:10 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] banana.livejournal.com
Heh!

Date: 2009-07-01 04:12 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] daphnep.livejournal.com
That's really cool.

It's funny how the variations in color actually make the lines more evident, and draw attention to that extreme angle and perspective on the roof. The composition gets better, even though the composition hardly changed. Awesome.

Date: 2009-07-01 07:22 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Like the more vivid color makes the whole thing more... lookable? Visually inviting? I think the comination of the color and the crop improves the bottom part a lot. It separates the railing from the concrete, and removes a bit of excess.

Profile

low_delta: (Default)
low_delta

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910111213 14
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 23rd, 2026 11:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios