Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: wasted time
- 2: police band
- 3: basketball
- 4: amusements
- 5: minus 2 was cold
- 6: so cold
- 7: The Lake Michigan Project
- 8: job on the ranch in Montana
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: Violet Night by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 12:33 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 05:31 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 07:55 pm (UTC)From:As far as the impossibility of setting up a multi-faction government in Iraq, I don't know about that. Shi'ites and Sunnis don't get along very well, but the only reason they're at each others' throats in Iraq right now is because the lack of strong leadership means that either side could come out on top and run the whole country. The Kurds are probably always going to marginalized. I think it would be fantastic if the Kurds ended up with their own little country to call their own, but unforunately, nobody likes to give up land. Just ask the Palestinians.
I think the only way the Iraq situation is going to work is if a balance is found between two extremes: 1) letting them figure out their own way to run their country, and 2) Getting the entire international community in on the situation. As is, I'll bet the Iraqi people feel like the U.S. is trying to bully them into setting up a Western-style government, their will be damned. Democracy by the point of the sword, as it were. Either we leave them to their own devices (which would probably result in a bloody Civil War, which wouldn't be much different than how things are now), or the international community--led by the U.N. and any other international bodies that could lend a hand--should come in and play mediator to the individual factions' squabbles, working things out diplomatically until a reasonable consensus is reached. Stranger things have happened, and I'll bet the Iraqis will have settled their disputes within the next ten or fifteen years.