Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: wasted time
- 2: police band
- 3: basketball
- 4: amusements
- 5: minus 2 was cold
- 6: so cold
- 7: The Lake Michigan Project
- 8: job on the ranch in Montana
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: Violet Night by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 09:22 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:52 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 09:38 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 09:46 pm (UTC)From:(1) She has always been so exceptionally quick and bright with verbal learning, that because math takes more time for her to grasp, she thinks she's not math smart. (I recognize myself in her.)
(2) Her 5th grade teacher didn't like teaching math and didn't even complete the math textbook (although the other teachers managed to), setting R back in terms of understanding beginning 6th grade math.
Fortunately, her current math teacher seems to be really on top of things, and I'm hoping it's the year that R develops confidence in her math skills and prevents future math phobia.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:53 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 03:02 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 09:53 pm (UTC)From:Some folks just don't find working that part of their brain enjoyable, I spose. That would make sense.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:47 am (UTC)From:It's like using a calculator - you learn to rely on it, and your basic skills fade.
But it's not a matter of finding it enjoyable. It's about getting through life with a minimum of complication.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:55 am (UTC)From:I thought you were talking about higher level math, not balancing your checkbook, figuring out how many pounds of fertilizer to buy or doubling a recipe kind of math.
I have yet to uncomplicate my life with the use of imaginary numbers.
:-)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 03:06 am (UTC)From:I have the price of a forklift in 2006, which is $25,135.00. I know that it's 3% more than the price was in 2002. What was the price in 2002?
I figured there was a formula to find out the answer. Just subtracting 3% is close, but not correct. The 3% was the increase over the 2002 number, not 3% less of the 2006 number.
Turns out that I just had to take $25,135 and divide it by 1.03. I don't know exactly WHY that works, but it does. How does dividing magically come up with the original number in 2002??
And then this too...WHY when you divide 1.00 by 1.03, does it come up with 0.97087378640776699029126213592233? Where the hell did all those crazy numbers come from?? It's so random! One divided by three is simply .33333333333 etc. That makes sense to me. There's a pattern.
I need to go to bed. My ears are bleeding and I'm breaking out in a rash...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 03:11 am (UTC)From:If you were figuring out the price happening in the future you would have multiplied by 1.03. Since your going backwards, timewise, you do the opposite, you divide.
ta da!
Those random repeating numbers are unsettling, aren't they.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 03:20 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 11:18 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:55 am (UTC)From:Some people think they don't get it, even when they do. Seriously. Try not to be like that.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 11:46 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 02:48 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 11:36 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 01:35 am (UTC)From:But that's the way everyone is. Nobody learns more, just for the sake of learning, unless they have to, in college.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 03:15 am (UTC)From:I was reading the discussions in this thread before I answered this, and like you I was better at geometry in high school than algebra. I
"got" geometry. It was visual, and I could see a purpose. In HIGH SCHOOL I sucked and hated algebra. In college I had to take algebra three times at two different schools to score higher than a D.. but that same algebra that I could not pass with an acceptable grade, I did in my head automatically in chemistry to figure out unknowns. That was a surprise to me.. that I was doing that same crap IN MY HEAD, and understanding it in chemistry, when I could not pass a test in it in math.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 05:13 am (UTC)From:(which, I believe, is an oxymoron) I get so confused. If I can reduce it to an algebraic formula I often understand something better. Often, you notice I said. Not always.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 05:22 am (UTC)From:I use basic trigonometry all the time, though. That's easy.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 07:04 pm (UTC)From:Still, basic arithmetic makes me thankful for calculators.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 01:28 am (UTC)From: