You know something I hate? Bonus tracks on CDs. They make it sound like it's supposed to be some great thing, like a... bonus or something. Usually, it's a song that didn't make the cut, that the band didn't want to put on the CD. So why do we get them? Someobdy at the label thinks it will sell more records. Either they want to make the record longer, so people think they're getting their money's worth, or they want to be able to put a sticker on the packaging, making it sound like the customer is getting a better deal. Doing this to a brand new record is just dumb, since, like I said, if the songs should have been there in the first place, it would have been. What is annoying is when bonus tracks are added to new releases of previous recordings. I'm sure most people are happy to hear new songs, but I don't want to hear them on my old familiar records, for the same reason - the artist didn't intend for them to be there.
Here's what bugs me the most: the added songs disrupt the continuity of the album.
Let me give you an example. All of Patti Smith's records were remastered and repackaged for CD, in 1996, and on each one, there is a bonus track or two. Her first album, Horses, ends with the soft song, "Elegy." That song just takes you away. sometimes I even fall asleep to it. How nice it would be if the record ended there... like it used to. But no, what happens next. A loud and raucous punk version of "My Generation." "We don't need your fuckin' shit! Hope I die because of it!" Oh yeah. That's just what you need to snap you back to life after that boring old "Elegy." *rolls eyes* It was a good song to hear, because it is from the time that the album was made - it was a B-side - but why couldn't they have put it somewhere else? Like on a compilation made up of all the bonus tracks they added to the remasters?
Live's Throwing Copper is one of my favorite records. It ends with a very intense song with a long, burning fade out. I feel the song for quite a while - or would, if they didn't follow it up with a very weak bonus track. Sucky songs are no bonus.
Some records add four or five songs. Many of these records are long enough. And often, these extra songs are remixes of ones that are already on the records. Why do I want to listen to them again? At least do us the favor of putting the extra songs on a separate disc, so when the original album ends, it still ends.
It's all about marketing.
Here's what bugs me the most: the added songs disrupt the continuity of the album.
Let me give you an example. All of Patti Smith's records were remastered and repackaged for CD, in 1996, and on each one, there is a bonus track or two. Her first album, Horses, ends with the soft song, "Elegy." That song just takes you away. sometimes I even fall asleep to it. How nice it would be if the record ended there... like it used to. But no, what happens next. A loud and raucous punk version of "My Generation." "We don't need your fuckin' shit! Hope I die because of it!" Oh yeah. That's just what you need to snap you back to life after that boring old "Elegy." *rolls eyes* It was a good song to hear, because it is from the time that the album was made - it was a B-side - but why couldn't they have put it somewhere else? Like on a compilation made up of all the bonus tracks they added to the remasters?
Live's Throwing Copper is one of my favorite records. It ends with a very intense song with a long, burning fade out. I feel the song for quite a while - or would, if they didn't follow it up with a very weak bonus track. Sucky songs are no bonus.
Some records add four or five songs. Many of these records are long enough. And often, these extra songs are remixes of ones that are already on the records. Why do I want to listen to them again? At least do us the favor of putting the extra songs on a separate disc, so when the original album ends, it still ends.
It's all about marketing.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 06:05 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 06:08 pm (UTC)From: