thanks for the link

Date: 2003-03-22 10:11 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] cherie.livejournal.com
Hopefully some 17-1/2 year olds will read this and conclude that 'soldier' as career choice might not be right move.

Date: 2003-03-22 02:17 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] banana.livejournal.com
If I understand this correctly, this means that former armed service personnel will still get more help than people from other professions in similar circumstances, but not as much more as previously. I'm not sure why they should get any extra help. I can feel some people starting to hate me now, so I should remind anyone reading this that I live in a country with free universal medical care, so I don't see why people who weren't in the services should be treated *less* well than those who weren't.

I don't think that I expressed myself too well in the previous paragraph. My point is that everyone should be treated equally.

Date: 2003-03-23 09:27 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Personally, I'd like to see free medical care here, so if one group gets it, I have a little trouble arguing against it. People who have served in the armed services have always been guaranteed certain benefits, like money for college, or health care. I'm really not sure what the conditions are that they recieve these, like having to have a certain amount of time served, or what.

Date: 2003-03-24 10:51 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] vlinker.livejournal.com
i find "canned" e-mail support messages repulsive......no matter what cause they are for or against......

Profile

low_delta: (Default)
low_delta

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 09:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios