Page Summary
whorlpool.livejournal.com - ..
dwivian - (no subject)
queenofstripes.livejournal.com - (no subject)
specificocean.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - Re: ..
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
specificocean.livejournal.com - (no subject)
whorlpool.livejournal.com - Re: ..
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - Re: ..
specificocean.livejournal.com - (no subject)
whorlpool.livejournal.com - Re: ..
dwivian - Re: ..
whorlpool.livejournal.com - Re: ..
low-delta.livejournal.com - Re: ..
emschin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
emschin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
banana.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sirreal13.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-delta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
banana.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: Violet Night by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
..
Date: 2002-12-16 10:02 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-16 10:08 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 02:49 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 05:33 am (UTC)From:Or meaning changes....e.g. things 'impacting'......
Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 06:43 am (UTC)From:Funny though. I had a teacher tell me that once, and every time I looked it up it turned out she was right. I guess you just have ifferent dictionaries than I.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 06:44 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 06:45 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 06:45 am (UTC)From:But no, this word didn't really bother me.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 07:07 am (UTC)From:But the misuse of impact does.
The dictionary people agree, while conceding that the usage will eventually become standard....:-(
Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 07:29 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 08:45 am (UTC)From:Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 08:45 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 09:00 am (UTC)From:Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 09:14 am (UTC)From:VERY fortunately
Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 11:57 am (UTC)From:Dictionaries take the path of either
1) recording words in use, or
2) recording language in use
lots take the second path, and as a result some horrible things are "in the dictionary". Like "ain't".....
Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 01:34 pm (UTC)From:In this case, though, it's a word.
Re: ..
Date: 2002-12-17 02:46 pm (UTC)From:I'm wondering when "alls," and "yous" will show up in the dictionaries.
(thanks Blonnie)
no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 04:03 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 04:14 pm (UTC)From:"Since the early 20th century some critics have insisted alright is wrong, but is has its defenders and its users." ( blah blah blah...
and then they cite it as having been used by Gertrude Stein.)
I like Gertrude Stein but her usage is hardly normative!!
no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 04:22 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 05:18 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 09:14 pm (UTC)From:-Calvin
no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 09:15 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2002-12-17 09:16 pm (UTC)From:Sheesh.
:-D
no subject
Date: 2002-12-18 02:21 am (UTC)From:And does alcoves mean every single cove?