low_delta: (photographer)
I found this bridge on Google Maps, and had hoped I'd be able to see it. It turned out we had some free time on Tuesday morning, before Abbotsford opened.


Leaderfoot Viaduct is an old railroad bridge that crosses the River Tweed. It was built in 1863, and its use ended in 1965. It's 166 feet high, from the river, and the arches are 43 feet wide. It was renovated in the early 1990's.




Next to Leaderfoot Viaduct is Drygrange bridge. Built in 1780, it was in use until the new bridge was completed, in 1973.


It shows its age, but it's still holding together. I didn't enhance these colors much.


At the entrance to the bridge, there are some benches with river poetry carved on them.




It was windy, but otherwise, the weather was good.

Date: 2013-10-16 04:33 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] parlet.livejournal.com
Your photographs are amazing!

Date: 2013-10-16 04:56 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] hinterland.livejournal.com
Drygrange bridge is so much more beautiful than the new one. The colours are amazing. And the viaduct is spectacular!

Date: 2013-10-16 06:36 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] lacachet.livejournal.com
Amazing, isn't it, when you think of the human effort put into building those bridges, with very little in the way of "modern" machinery.

Bridge

Date: 2013-10-16 01:17 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] likethebeer.livejournal.com
That's really cool. And the close-up with the color is pretty spectacular.

Date: 2013-10-16 01:36 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] pondhopper.livejournal.com
The viaduct bridge (I keep wanting to say aqueduct bridge because it looks like a very stylized Roman aqueduct) is wonderful!Is that your car I see parked through the arch?

The contrast between the old and new bridges is cool but I really want to knock the new one down and use the old one again though I suppose it's a new road as well.

Love the close-up!

No wonder you liked the gorge bridge in Ronda so much.
;)

Date: 2013-10-16 05:09 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] mummm.livejournal.com
I agree with the others who said that they prefer the old bridge. It seems like the new bridge is so sterile and wasted a lot of materials. It is much too big! The old one was grand!

I also see the new one as an updated Roman Viaduct.
Edited Date: 2013-10-16 05:10 pm (UTC)

Date: 2013-10-16 05:38 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Thank you!

Date: 2013-10-16 05:39 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'd like to see how they did it.

Date: 2013-10-16 05:46 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Just to be clear, when I said the old one was in use until the new one was built, the "new one" is the box girder bridge behind it in picture 3. So if you're saying that you want to knock down Leaderfoot Viaduct in favor of Drygrange Bridge, I'd have to disagree. (Leaderfoot is a railroad bridge.)

But even so, I'd still rather keep the ugly one, and preserve the old one. Not only that, but the disadvantage to the beauty of the old one is that you can't see it when you're on it.

Not our car. This one was just driving through.

Date: 2013-10-16 05:49 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Leaderfoot Viaduct is a railroad bridge. Trains can't go up and down hills like cars can, so they had to keep it high, and also cut into the hills on either side of the river.

There are few differences between the two, besides their size. Drygrange has carved decorations on the sides. Drygrange has little outcroppings between the arches. Possibly for toll collectors. Drygrange has a stone railing, and it slopes upwards toward the middle.

Date: 2013-10-16 05:57 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] mummm.livejournal.com
Awww... I see then. I just like the old colors and carvings.

Date: 2013-10-16 10:12 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] pondhopper.livejournal.com
No...I must have expressed myself badly. I love both older bridges. The modern one was obvious and that's the one I dislike. It's just your generic box girder bridge...looks out of place behind the old one.
I know...progress and all that.
True though, about not seeing the beauty of a bridge you're actually driving on unless it's a huge suspension bridge.
:)

Date: 2013-10-16 11:55 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Oh, definitely. It's a lot more interesting. Prettier than the the somewhat-newer one (I was probably overstating the similarities). I like them both though, and for different reasons. I like the engineering achievement of the bigger one, and the efficiency (efficiency is grace!).

Date: 2013-10-16 11:56 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com
Inefficient and dangerous? ;-)

Date: 2013-10-17 12:27 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] mummm.livejournal.com
You are right.

Date: 2013-10-17 06:51 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] promiseoftin.livejournal.com
Gorgeous!

Date: 2013-10-17 09:03 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] ravenfeather.livejournal.com
Drygrange bridge is GORGEOUS!

Profile

low_delta: (Default)
low_delta

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910111213 14
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 23rd, 2026 04:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios