low_delta: (I can't explain)
low_delta ([personal profile] low_delta) wrote2006-06-16 11:40 am

QotD

Why do they call those little candy bars "fun size"? Why don't they call them "irritating size"?

[identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Or the even tinier kind that they make for Hallowe'en.

[identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
They could use descriptive names, like, "bite-sized" or "inhalant sized."

[identity profile] mipplet.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
That is a VERY good question!

[identity profile] vyoma.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
That depends on what you do with the candy bars for "fun." I don't find eating to be fun (enjoyable, sure, but "fun?" Nah).

I assume that there are others who are inserting the candy bars into orifices other than their mouths. Those who, for example, enjoy occasionally ramming a Twix bar up their bum will consider the small ones "fun size." The large ones (like the ones sold at movie theaters) tend to be more "irritating."

Aren't you glad you asked? ;)

[identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com 2006-06-17 02:01 pm (UTC)(link)
The large ones tend to be more "irritating."

Somehow, I doubt if that's true for all users. ;-)

[identity profile] shoo.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
HAHAHAHAHA!
To small for fun if you ask me...:)

[identity profile] eyelid.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
because "inadequate size" or "pathetic size" don't sell as well :)

[identity profile] low-delta.livejournal.com 2006-06-17 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
How about "cheapass size"?

[identity profile] mummm.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Good point!

"Micro Sized" might be more appropriate?

[identity profile] mummm.livejournal.com 2006-06-17 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
That works!