low_delta (
low_delta
) wrote
2003
-
02
-
27
10:19 pm
spam
"Online predators target 1 out of 4 children."
I think we should improve those odds. Lets get more children online and lower the ratio.
Okay, that's probably not funny to anyone who actually has kids.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
tully-monster.livejournal.com
2003-02-27 09:07 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Or to anyone who doesn't!
no subject
low-delta.livejournal.com
2003-02-27 09:33 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Just messing with statistics.
no subject
zonal.livejournal.com
2003-02-28 06:28 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I thought it was funny. It'd fit in well at
badtaste
.
no subject
low-delta.livejournal.com
2003-02-28 06:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I hadn't heard of there. I'll have to check it out.
Re:
zonal.livejournal.com
2003-02-28 07:04 am (UTC)
(
link
)
It's a great place for those who aren't easily offended.
no subject
seamusd.livejournal.com
2003-02-27 10:33 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Where are you getting this figure? How does if define "online predator"?
no subject
low-delta.livejournal.com
2003-02-28 06:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
It was from a spam. Just a three line intoduction to some content filtering thing. One reason why I felt comfortabe saying something in such bad taste.
7 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Re:
no subject
no subject