Wow, I've been reading and arguing so much about this, the cross-linking had come full circle :) I saw SFGate and assume the link was this. (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/01/06/national2349EST0871.DTL)
And there's nothing to be debunked, really. Did Bursey break the law? Probably, but when laws are arbitrarily applied, it's hard to know when that's the case. He was made into a one-man restricted zone. (and from the links Dwivian gave, his assessment that this situation isn't a good example for advocacy seems as much to do with his objection to Bursey as a person.)
no subject
And there's nothing to be debunked, really. Did Bursey break the law? Probably, but when laws are arbitrarily applied, it's hard to know when that's the case. He was made into a one-man restricted zone. (and from the links Dwivian gave, his assessment that this situation isn't a good example for advocacy seems as much to do with his objection to Bursey as a person.)
It's a question of the greater outrage.