Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: New York Public Library
- 2: trip report, 7, home
- 3: trip report, 3, injury
- 4: the library project
- 5: Sunday
- 6: long day
- 7: wasted time
- 8: police band
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: Violet Night by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
..
Date: 2001-02-01 09:54 pm (UTC)From:My quick answer: No.
My slower answer: It depends on how it's handled.
Personally, every increase in power given to any "faith-based" organization feels like a shot through my heart. But then again, people are truly hurting, and they do need help.
Re: ..
Date: 2001-02-01 10:01 pm (UTC)From:Separation - hmm...
Date: 2001-02-02 09:17 am (UTC)From:Well, answer (a) is that if church and state are separate, no money should be given to religious groups. Answer (b) is that if services are outsourced by the state, can't religious groups be the service providers as much as anyone else?
With church and state integrated, we have very little influence exerted by religion, and no govt money handed over. You have them supposedly separate, but religious groups can have a big influence.
regarding giving fed, $$$ to religious institutions
Date: 2001-02-09 09:07 pm (UTC)From:It seems like it might be very easy for government to exert influence over religious institutions if it was contributing to the financing of those same institutions.
It seems like the separation of Church and State was established not only to protect the State from the Church but also to protect the Church from the State.
Re: regarding giving fed, $$$ to religious institutions
Date: 2001-02-10 08:52 pm (UTC)From:Yes, I hadn't looked at it that way yet. I usually don't give that much thought to the protection of those organizations.